days left to the 2024 election! Your ballot is your power, and when we show up, equality wins. Click here to visit our 2024 Voting Center!
Michigan
This category evaluates whether discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is prohibited by the city, county, or state in areas of employment, housing, and public accommodations.
** On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination are prohibited under federal sex-based employment protections. Nevertheless, it is imperative that localities continue enacting explicitly LGBTQ+-inclusive comprehensive non-discrimination laws since it will likely take additional litigation for Bostock to be fully applied to all sex-based protections under existing federal civil rights law. Moreover, federal law currently lacks sex-based protections in numerous key areas of life, including public spaces and services. Lastly, there are many invaluable benefits to localizing inclusive protections even when they exist on higher levels of government. For these reasons, the MEI will continue to only award credit in Part I for state, county, or municipal non-discrimination laws that expressly include sexual orientation and gender identity. Credit may be awarded on the state level if a state has definitively applied Bostock’s reasoning to include LGBTQ+ people under state sex nondiscrimination protections.
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
Employment | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 | Sexual Orientation: 0 Gender Identity: 0 | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 |
Housing | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 | Sexual Orientation: 0 Gender Identity: 0 | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 |
Public Accommodations | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 | Sexual Orientation: 0 Gender Identity: 0 | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 | Sexual Orientation: 5 Gender Identity: 5 |
Total |
30 |
30 |
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
All-Gender Single Occupancy Facilities | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Protects Youth From Conversion Therapy | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By offering equivalent benefits and protections to LGBTQ+ employees, awarding contracts to fair-minded businesses, and taking steps to ensure an inclusive workplace, municipalities commit themselves to treating LGBTQ+ employees equally.
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Discrimination in City Employment | Sexual Orientation: 7 Gender Identity: 7 | Sexual Orientation: 7 Gender Identity: 7 | ||
Transgender-Inclusive Healthcare Benefits | 0 | 6 | ||
City Contractor Non-Discrimination Ordinance | Sexual Orientation: 3 Gender Identity: 3 | Sexual Orientation: 3 Gender Identity: 3 | ||
Inclusive Workplace | 0 | 2 | ||
Total |
20 |
28 |
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
City Employee Domestic Partner Benefits | 0 | 1 |
This section assesses the efforts of the city to ensure LGBTQ+ constituents are included in city services and programs.
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
Human Rights Commission | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
Enforcement Mechanism in Human Rights Commission | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
LGBTQ+ Liaison in City Executive's Office | 0 | 5 | ||
Total |
7 |
12 |
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
Youth Bullying Prevention Policy for City Services | Sexual Orientation: 0 Gender Identity: 0 | Sexual Orientation: 1 Gender Identity: 1 | ||
City provides services to/supports LGBTQ+ youth | 0 | 2 | ||
City provides services to/supports LGBTQ+ people experiencing homelessness | 0 | 2 | ||
City provides services to/supports LGBTQ+ older adults | 0 | 2 | ||
City provides services to/supports people living with HIV or AIDS | 0 | 2 | ||
City provides services to/supports the transgender community | 0 | 2 |
Fair enforcement of the law includes responsible reporting of hate crimes and engaging with the LGBTQ+ community in a thoughtful and respectful way.
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
LGBTQ+ Police Liaison or Task Force | 10 | 10 | ||
Reported 2019 Hate Crimes Statistics to the FBI | 12 | 12 | ||
Total |
22 |
22 |
This category measures the city leadership’s commitment to fully include the LGBTQ+ community and to advocate for full equality.
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leadership's Public Position on LGBTQ+ Equality | 5 | 5 | ||
Leadership's Pro-Equality Legislative or Policy Efforts | 1 | 3 | ||
Total |
6 |
8 |
Criteria | State | County | City |
Total Points Available |
---|---|---|---|---|
Openly LGBTQ+ elected or appointed municipal leaders | 2 | 2 | ||
City test limits of restrictive state law | 0 | 3 |
Image: