Voting Rights Advancement Act
H.R. 2978; S. 1419
In Shelby County v. Holder in June 2013, the Supreme Court invalidated a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, a law that is designed to ensure minority voters across the country are able to participate equally in the electoral process by prohibiting discriminatory voting practices and removing barriers to voting. Among the law’s key provisions was an enforcement mechanism to prevent states with a history of voting discrimination from making changes to voting laws and practices without pre-submitting those changes for review by federal officials. The Supreme Court held that the formula for deciding which states and localities were required to pre-approve changes in voting laws and practices was unconstitutional, which severely weakened the federal government’s oversight of discriminatory voting practices.
Since the Supreme Court’s decision, states and localities have brazenly pushed forward potentially discriminatory changes to voting practices, such as changing district boundaries to disadvantage select voters, instituting more onerous voter identification laws, and changing polling locations with little notice. Voters are more vulnerable to discrimination now than any time since the Voting Rights Act was signed into law more than fifty years ago.
Rather than addressing these instances of voter discrimination, President Donald Trump has instead focused his attention on voter fraud, which is extremely uncommon. He has falsely claimed that millions of people voted illegally in the 2016 election to explain his loss of the popular vote. The President established the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity with Vice President Mike Pence as Chairman and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach as Vice-Chair. Based on its official mandate and actions to date, all signs suggest that the Pence-Kobach Commission will be used as a tool to suppress the vote.
LGBTQ People and Voting Discrimination
Transgender people are particularly vulnerable to voting discrimination and disenfranchisement due primarily to challenges around valid identification documents. Many transgender people do not have forms of ID that reflect their gender, either because they are in the process of changing their documents or face financial or legal barriers to doing so. In addition, many LGBTQ people face compounded discrimination based on other characteristics, including race, age, and economic status. These vulnerabilities weaken our entire community’s voting power.
What is the Voting Rights Advancement Act?
Fortunately, the Supreme Court’s decision was limited in scope and did not bar Congress from creating a new formula. The Voting Rights Advancement Act would respond to the unique, modern day challenges of voting discrimination by:
Modernizing the VRA’s preclearance formula to cover states and localities with a pattern of discrimination;
Ensuring that last-minute voting changes do not adversely affect voters by requiring jurisdictions to publicly disclose all voting changes that occur 180 days before an election;
Expanding the Attorney General’s authority to send federal observers to any jurisdiction where it is believed there is a substantial risk of discrimination at the polls on election day or during an early voting period; and
Improving the voting rights for Native Americans and Alaskan Natives.
What is the Current Status of the Bill?
The Voting Rights Advancement Act was introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Terri Sewell (D-AL) on June 21, 2017 and in the Senate by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) on June 22, 2017.
Last Updated: November 6, 2017