Another District Court Finds DOMA Unconstitutional
July 31, 2012 by Brian Moulton, Legal Director
Today, a Connecticut federal judge appointed by President George W. Bush became the latest to rule that Section Three of the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act – which denies federal recognition and more than 1,100 rights and benefits to even lawfully married same-sex couples – is unconstitutional, according to BuzzFeed. This is the fifth district court to find DOMA unconstitutional, following similar decisions in Massachusetts, California, and New York.
The plaintiffs in this case are represented by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, which also brought the DOMA challenge, Gill v. OPM, that brought the first victory in a federal appeals court and has now been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. In this case, Judge Vanessa Bryant concluded that laws that discriminate based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more rigorous review – what courts call “heightened scrutiny” – but even under the most deferential standard “no conceivable rational basis exists” to deny recognition to lawfully married same-sex couples, and therefore DOMA violates the equal protection principles of the Fifth Amendment.
You can read the full opinion here.
Related Posts
Issues: Federal Advocacy
Event: Lessons from the 2012 State Victories for Marriage Equality
May 22, 2013
Issues: Laws and Legislation
Faith Leaders Speak Out for Marriage Equality in Front of Supreme Court
April 10, 2013
Blog: Defense of Marriage Act
Immigration Series: Forced to Choose Between My Love and My Life
April 17, 2013





