ois-bible


From Easter through Ordinary Time, Year B
The following conversations are included:

July 5, 2009 (14th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 9), Year B), Communities: Can't Live with Them or Without Them!

July 12, 2009 (15th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 10), Year B), Dare to Speak

July 19, 2009 (16th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 11), Year B), Discerning and Living the Liberating Word

July 26, 2009 (17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 12), Year B), Yearning for Abundance

August 2, 2009 (18th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 13), Year B), Giving Life to the World

August 9, 2009 (19th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 14), Year B), Facing Life's Extremes

August 16, 2009 (20th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 15), Year B), Nourished by Wisdom

August 23, 2009 (21st Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 16), Year B), Beyond Everything Familiar

August 30, 2009 (22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 17), Year B), Listening, Loving, Doing



 

14th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Proper 9, Year B

 

    Communities: Can't Live with Them
    or Without Them!

These Bible passages raise important questions about the positive and destructive dimensions of life in community.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

2 Samuel 5:1-5, 9-10 & Psalm 48 or Ezekiel 2:1-5 & Psalm 123; 2 Corinthians 12:2-10; Mark 6:1-13


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“We live and dance at the margins of many communities where we create new centers of authenticity and grace.””

Joretta Marshall

“God’s goodness will be a circle that draws our critics in – if we are faithful to our calling as people of faith, true to ourselves in both faith and affection."

Steve Sprinkle

“We celebrate together God’s grace that embraces all people, especially the unlikely, and empowers us to manifest God’s inclusive love.”

Warren Carter


    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

Two connected and ambiguous themes emerged for us in our conversation about today’s Bible passages. The first centers on the profound ways unlikely people are involved in God’s purposes. The second concerns the supportive and rejecting role community plays for such people.  What do we do when the community says “no?” Both themes are of great importance for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, as well as any marginalized communities.

In 2 Samuel 5:1-5, 9-10, the anointing of David as ruler of all Israel expresses both themes. David is a complex figure. On one hand, he is an admirable figure, the companion of Jonathan, the attractive and brave young shepherd boy-hero who slays the giant Goliath, the subject of Michelangelo’s marvelous statue David. He is, though, also very flawed and vulnerable. He blunders in his adultery with Bathsheba, has Uriah killed, and is condemned by the prophet Nathan. Yet God chooses this unlikely character to be God’s representative, the agent of God’s will and presence.

That choice is expressed and affirmed through David’s community. “We are your bone and flesh,” the tribes of Israel declare (verse 1). They recognize God’s choice of David (verse 2) and David makes a covenant with them (verse 3). Yet the community of Israel’s embrace of David comes at the expense of, even the violent exclusion of another, namely the former king Saul who has been killed.  Remembering the time when Saul and David were in conflict, the community declares, “For some time, while Saul was king over us, it was you who led Israel out…” (verse 2). Israel’s comment recalls the violent rejection of which communities are capable in the name of God, while it also identifies a subversive and empowering practice that can emerge in communities. It recognizes that community often forms on the margins, where people find morsels of hope and life in contexts of conflict with the sanctioned center.

What are the qualities of life-giving communities that often live on the margins?

In Psalm 48, the community celebrates its identity as God’s chosen people in God’s chosen city, contemplating God’s “steadfast love” and guidance (verses 9 and 13). This is a cozy celebration of specialness for an unlikely small nation. Yet their chosenness as a community also comes at the expense and exclusion of others. This time the “others” are foreign rulers who panic, flee, tremble like women in labor, and are shattered like ships before the greatness of God (verses 4-7). This xenophobia provides a destructive barrier that disqualifies others from the experience of God’s steadfast love.

Communities reject their own, as well as outsiders, as many LGBT people know. Ezekiel – with his mortality and humanness emphasized in being addressed as “mortal one” - is called to stand and hear God’s address (Ezekiel 2:1-2). He is commissioned to a daunting task, namely to be a prophet to Israel. Who wants this job? The language emphasizes from the outset that his own community is unlikely to welcome him. The people rebel and transgress; they are impudent and stubborn, likely to refuse to hear. Ezekiel’s experience resembles that of the psalmist who laments, “we have had more than enough of contempt…of the scorn of those who are at ease, of the contempt of the proud.” (Psalm 123:3b-4). What to do when the community is already saying no?

What sustains us in the midst of communities of rejection?

The New Testament apostle Paul faces a similar situation. He fights for his integrity, ministry, and gospel with the Corinthians, a community he founded. Where he ought to find support, he experiences rejection. In response to their demands to know whether he is a legitimate apostle through whom God speaks (2 Corinthians 12:12; 13:3), he sarcastically and self-righteously points, it often seems, not to his accomplishments but to the interplay between his brokenness (the mysterious “thorn in the flesh”) and God’s gracious, sustaining power that he encounters precisely in his “weakness” (verses 8-10).

In an amazing act of reframing, what appears as disqualifying brokenness is an opportunity for blessing, “my grace is sufficient for you” (verse 9).  This is no easy cliché, but is a hard-won affirmation as the whole letter demonstrates. In the midst of rejection, Paul finds acceptance, even vindication, but certainly sustaining solidarity with all those marginalized by communities to which they thought they belonged. Such an unlikely one is caught up in the life and death struggle of the gospel.   

In Mark 6:1-13, Jesus faces a similar situation. “In his hometown” (verse 1), among folks who might be expected to be supportive, Jesus too encounters those who “take offense at him” (verse 3). As with Ezekiel and Paul, the community that should offer sanctuary turns against him. Clobbered by those at home, and clobbered by the larger society, he calls his followers to the same vulnerable way of life (verses 8-9) in the midst of rejecting communities (verse 11).

As with Ezekiel, Paul and Jesus, why would anyone set off on such a difficult journey when the community already says “no”? Because there are, simultaneously, communities that say “yes,” communities that empower and sustain. These disciples, companions of Jesus, go as part of a community of twelve followers (verse 7). They go as a community “two by two” (verse 7). And they find some who welcome them (verse 10) and experience healing and wholeness (verse 13), even in the midst of hostility. Such communities offer morsels of sustaining hope to other travelers. 

These readings for today urge us to be vigilant about the types of communities to which we belong, ever aware of their blessings but also much attuned to their destructive impact, and ever mindful of the “unlikely” places, people, and communities in our midst caught up in God’s good purposes.

How might God be calling you to participate in your community – to challenge it, extend it, work within it?

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

     We know you, Holy One,
        as the One who lives and
        moves in communities of all kinds.
    Whether we find ourselves in the center, on the margins,
        or somewhere in between,
        may we nurture those qualities in our churches and congregations
        that are life-giving, even as we challenge those that are death-dealing.
    Be with us as we move with integrity and grace. Amen.

Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

15th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Proper 10, Year B

 

    Dare to Speak

What does faithfulness look like? Faithful to whom? To what? Why does opposition, even violence, often accompany faithfulness and celebration? How do we live in the face of it?

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

2 Samuel 6:1-5, 12b-19 & Psalm 24 or Amos 7:7-15 & Psalm 85:8-13; Ephesians 1:3-14; Mark 6:14-29


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“We wait for ‘the fullness of time’ when God will gather all people to God’s self in love and acceptance.  Until then, may we be lavished with grace, quick to love, slow to anger and committed to justice.

Steve Sprinkle

“The God of the rhythm of life invites us into a faithfulness that sometimes comes at great cost. Today’s Bible passages remind us of the grace and persistence that is needed in light of the cost.”

Joretta Marshall

“In the ambiguities of faithful living, life-giving visions accompany death-dealing realities – requiring persistent, courageous and wise engagement.”

Warren Carter


    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

The scene in 2 Samuel 6 depicts vibrant, colorful, noisy, dynamic celebration as David and his followers bring the ark of God into Jerusalem. The ark, containing the tablets of the covenant, connected the past with the present and signified God’s powerful presence with the people. Its presence in Jerusalem, David’s city, represented God’s blessing of David.  But not everyone is in a party mood. David’s wife, Michal, the daughter of the former ruler Saul (whom David replaced), despises David’s exuberant (and immodest – see verse 20) dancing (verse 16).  The scene is full of emotion and challenge: worship and complaint, celebration and opposition, faithfulness and despising.

In another passage from the Hebrew Scripture, Amos the prophet knows similar dynamics in his justice-speaking work. He has discerned God’s purposes to judge the people’s lack of justice (Amos 6:12-14) and unfaithful worship (Amos 7:7-9), including condemnation of the ruler Jeroboam. To declare these purposes faithfully, to speak truth to power, is a courageous act. To suggest, though, that a community does not live up to its noble self-image brings immediate opposition as lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender folks know only too well. A priest, Amaziah of Bethel, accuses Amos of being unfaithful, even unpatriotic, in “conspiring” against king Jeroboam. And instead of inviting dialogue with the “out-of-step” Amos, Amaziah urges him to go away ( Amos 7:12-13). Amos’ response is interesting. In the face of such social exclusion, he reasserts his identity as one who lives faithfully for God (Amos 7:14-15).

Asserting faithfulness can exclude or include. What is involved in including our critics and detractors as we wish to be included? How do we engage others in such a way that  God’s inclusive love is encountered?

Psalm 85 provides a hopeful juxtaposition to Amos’ experience. The psalm begins by acknowledging God’s forgiveness of, not wrathful judgment toward, the people. Verse 8’s receptivity to God, “Let me hear what God the Lord will speak,” contrasts with Amaziah’s rejection, though to be fair, the psalmist, unlike the prophet, is confident that God’s words comprise not judgment but peace and wholeness. Thereafter follows a wonderful vision in which (God’s) “steadfast love” meets (human) faithfulness,” and (God’s) “righteousness” effects (human) “peace” (verse 10).  

Ephesians 1:3-14 continues such a vision. God’s workings among people are marked by extravagant love and generosity (verses 4-6), “according to the riches of the grace God lavished upon us” (verses 7-8). They are also marked by an inclusiveness that “gathers up all things” in Christ (verse 10).  Such affirmations – which the passage frames as worship (verses 6 and 12)– derive from a small and marginalized community that celebrates its own inclusion in God’s plans without disinheriting or excluding anyone else.  “In Christ we have also obtained an inheritance” (verse 11).  The declarations of inclusion and inheritance that abound in this passage counter corrosive cultural messages of being unworthy, deviant, or wrong. The passage announces a loud “not true” to such verdicts and claims instead an inclusive solidarity that embraces all, both LGBT and straight.

But after the wonderful visions of faithfulness in Psalm 85 and Ephesians 1, the reading from Mark 6:14-29 brings us back to reality in a hurry. The story of John the Baptist’s execution is similar to Amos’ experience of the negative consequences of speaking truth to power.  On the basis of his faithfulness to the kinship laws in Leviticus 18:16 and 20:21, John has rebuked the “family values” of Herod Antipas and his “wife” Herodias. Or should that be Herodias, the wife of Herod’s brother, Philip (Mark 6:17-18)?  Herodias bears a grudge against John for his criticism, while Herod fears him (6:19-20). Subsequently, Herod makes a rash promise to Herodias’ daughter to give her whatever she wants, and the outcome is John’s head on a platter (6:22-28).

Again faithfulness is met not with peace as Psalm 85:8-10 imagines, but with opposition and conflict as it is with Amos. The scene celebrates not generous inclusion (so Ephesians 1) but violent exclusion.  Here faithfulness and violence, not faithfulness and steadfast love, go hand in hand. This very disturbing scene raises difficult questions for anybody and any community that lives “against-the-cultural-grain.” Should John have said nothing and self-protectively kept his objections to himself? After all, the chances of Herod and Herodias changing their ways just because a locust-eating prophet criticized them were not high. Would silence have been more prudent as well as self-preserving? Or would it have been cowardly and unfaithful, an opportunity to address a significant issue lost? How do we discern which is which?

How do the collisions between the wonderful visions of faithfulness offered by the readings from Psalm 85 and Ephesians 1 and the cruel rejection of Mark 6 function to shape your efforts to live faithfully and justly?  When are silence and invisibility prudent and self-protective, and when are they cowardly and unfaithful? How do we discern? 

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    Dear God, grant us grace
    that we may find the courage
    and the wisdom to celebrate
    your love inclusive of all, exclusive of none. Amen.

Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

16th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Proper 11, Year B

 

    Discerning and Living the Liberating Word

There is a Good Shepherd who binds up the wounds of a community in pain. Discernment is needed to identify the good shepherds and bad shepherds, as well as to identify dynamics for liberation in Bible passages which are sometimes used to abuse people.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

Jeremiah 23:1-6 & Psalm 23 or 2 Samuel 7:1-14a & Psalm 89:20-37 (not included in this commentary); Ephesians 2:11-22; Mark 6:30-34, 53-56.


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“As lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Christians, we need to stop apologizing for being in the Church. As much as we might not like to deal with religious intolerance, when we do not claim our right to be in church we fail to build a place for God to live.”

Beth Pease

“The idea of the Bible as a double-edged sword is important – the seed of liberation is imbedded in what can be taken as a justification for oppressive structures — hence, the importance of discerning the biblical text carefully.”

Miguel De La Torre

 “Consider how hard it is in our culture for someone who is a woman, a lesbian and a person of color to find time to stop, rest and find the community that will provide respite and healing. When the church provides that reality, it will be good news indeed.”

Judith Hoch Wray


    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

Psalm 23 provides a picture of a shepherd unlike the image of the shepherd found in the book of Jeremiah. This psalmist’s shepherd, identified with God, has rarely been experienced by LGBT folk in the church.  Hearing the affirmation that God, like a shepherd, anoints my head with oil — chooses me — and meets my needs, can be a very powerful word for those who have been abused by other “shepherds.” When ordination is prohibited by the church, what a good word that God anoints us! Even while rejected, we eat at the table prepared by God in the presence of our enemies. The Eucharist, the communion table, is for us! And to say that we will dwell in God’s house forever is a challenge and encouragement not to walk away. This house is ours. Let no one tell us otherwise.

Psalm 23 is traditionally used at funerals and memorial services.  How might LGBT people hear the psalm in new and radical ways?  What comfort and challenge does it bring to LGBT folk?

In Jeremiah 23:1-6, the prophet minces no words in the warning to those who are pushing the flock of God away, scattering and destroying many. Among our conversation group, we discussed how the pain of exile (of never being able to belong, no matter what you do) has been known by those LGBT folk who have been excluded from the church and church leadership.  This pain is not unlike the pain experienced by those who have immigrated to the United States and who now are no longer fully accepted in their home country nor fully accepted in the US.

Yet following the warning to those shepherds who have scattered God’s flock, the prophet Jeremiah preaches a word of restoration to those who have been driven away, to the remnant who will be brought back to the fold (verse 3).

The restoration of a remnant is cause for celebration, but be cautious. Who is the “faithful remnant?” We recognize that “faithful remnant” is language used by some who want to prevent LGBT Christians from being acknowledged in the Church. The text, then, is a double-edged sword: in it we can hear a word of liberation while others are using the same text as a word of condemnation. This calls for discernment and an ear for the liberating word.

We note that the Hebrew word tsedek is translated as “righteous” in Jeremiah 23:5-6 by the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, yet is more accurately understood as “justice” (“justicia” in Spanish) or “solidarity.”

Who gets to define who is the faithful remnant? Do you see LGBT people of faith as part of that remnant or outsiders?

 In reflecting on Ephesians 2:11-22, we recalled that in the first century, some thought that in order for a Gentile to become a Christian, they had to first become a Jew, to be circumcised. Some persons today think that before a lesbian, gay or bisexual person can become a Christian they must first become heterosexual, they must circumcise their sexual orientation. The good news is that no one has to be circumcised; no one has to give up who they are. No one has to adopt a different culture or orientation or gender identity in order to be Christian.

In Christ, because of Christ, we are an integral part of the community of faith, along with those who have positioned themselves as our enemies.  How do we approach and challenge those who are against us and are also a part of the Christian community?

In Mark 6:30-34, 53-56, Jesus recognized the tragedy of a community that had no good shepherd. For too long, many in the LGBT community have been like sheep without a shepherd. Places of spiritual rest and safety are few and far between for many. In the midst of intense political unrest and economic crises, today's disciples can hear Jesus' urging to come away to a supportive community and rest awhile. Creating those places of respite and claiming the gifts of the spiritual disciplines of retreat and prayer can be restoring acts that empower us for the work of healing.

To suggest that we can turn Jesus into a totem or good-luck charm that we can just touch and all our problems will just go away is a dangerous interpretation of the Scripture that can keep us from engaging the needs for social justice in our midst.   At the same time, for those of us who are workaholics, who think that the world will crumble into anarchy if we take a break from the struggle, it is good to know that there is someone we can touch, in whom we can rest and find healing.  We need to pay attention to how we are reading this verse. 

What kind of reader of this text from Mark are you? Do you read the text to help you avoid the struggle? Do you read the text to find the healing and encouragement to go on with the struggle for justice?

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    Good shepherd God,
    lead us in paths of justice.
    In the midst those who would be our enemies,
    feed us with hope and courage.
    Grant us discerning ears and supportive communities
    that together we may build and dwell in your house of love, forever!
    May it be so. Amen.

Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

17th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Proper 12, Year B

 

    Yearning for Abundance

God’s desire is our deepest desire. We yearn to be filled with God’s love and this love inspires our work for justice, reconciliation, and peace. Our God is a God of abundance and there is always enough deep love to go around.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

2 Kings 4:42-44 & Psalm 145:10-18 or 2 Samuel 11:1-15 & Psalm 14; Ephesians 3:14-21; John 6: 1-21


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“Without the yearning that resides at our core, we would lose our vitality, our creativity, our search for meaning”

Vanessa Owen

“Our inner life with God is infinite.  God’s abundance is not only actualized externally, but internally as well.”

Sara Rosenau

“An affirmation of desires is part of the fullness of God”

Yvonne Zimmerman


    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

What is a theology of abundance?  Three of the Bible readings for this Sunday shed some light on this question.  In 2 Kings 4:42-44, the story prefigures several accounts in the New Testament of Jesus’ miraculously feedings crowds with extraordinarily meager resources. A common theme is of a crowd “eating their fill” and still “having some left over”—the theological insight being that God is a God of abundant plenty.  Even when there is apparently not enough, the truer reality is that there is more than enough. 

What gifts do you or your community seem to withhold – fearful that there is not enough?

Psalm 145:1-18 proclaims that God’s openness satisfies our desires (verse 6). Here the insight is not the typical “Christian” insight that desire is bad or wrong and that God will transform our desires into something else (ostensibly better or more pure).  In this psalm, God satisfies human desires.  And, in satisfying our desires, God affirms them as legitimate, and even good.  Surely this kind of affirmation of desires is part of the fullness of God that Paul prays will fill the Ephesian Christians (Ephesians 3:19).

What are your desires? What would it look like for God to satisfy your desires?   As lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people of faith, when might “desire” be seen as a gift of God? When is it problematic?

In Ephesians 3:14-21, Paul’s ministry began with a mystical vision of the risen Christ and in this passage we encounter a continuation of this deep spirituality whether or not Paul was the author of the letter.  First, the writer rearticulates a vision of a new humanity made possible in Christ.  Christ proclaims peace: “Peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near” (Ephesians 2:16-17).  The prayer which follows is a testimony to the power of Christ’s love not only to reconcile communities and cultures, but to reconcile the conflict even in our inner life.  The prayer assures us that “Christ dwells in your hearts through faith, as you are being rooted and grounded in love” (verse17). 

Connecting with the other readings from today, we understand that our yearning and desire begin and end in our inner most being.  God’s abundance is not only actualized externally, but internally as well.  Our inner life with God is infinite, and our desire and yearnings are “filled with all the fullness of God” (verse 19).

This Sunday’s gospel lesson, John 6: 1-21, is a story about spiritual hunger.  The great church father, Augustine spoke this often quoted prayer, “Thou hast created us for thyself, O God, so that our hearts are restless until they find rest in thee.” It is this restless hunger that propelled thousands of people into the desert in search of a man named Jesus known to offer healing to those in need.  It is this restless hunger that perpetuates the powerful forces within contemporary culture that work to seduce our human longing towards things that provide empty satisfaction.  Consumerism is one of the ways that we manifest our spiritual hunger.  It is the restlessness of our hearts that convinces us to “Supersize It” at McDonald’s and to buy homes that are 3500 square feet.  It is this restless longing that calls us to search social, romantic or sexual websites in an attempt to feel loved and connected.  Our restless longing often comes in the form of addictions and it gets expressed in the misled belief that we need to be funnier, more attractive, smarter, wealthier, and more successful.

John’s gospel story functions as a reminder to us that the restlessness in the human heart will never be finally stilled by any object or project or person or place. The longing is eternal.  It is God-given.  It is the place where humanity and God are most intimately connected. And it is actually, good. Without the yearning that resides at our core, we would loose our vitality; our creativity; our search for meaning. Our search for the holy would ebb away and all of our greatest potential and divine possibility would eventually evaporate.  Our longing is but an eternal echo of the Divine Longing, which has created us and will sustain us; just as the thousands of people in the Gospel story were sustained and fed by a compassionate Jesus. Our task is to trust that God can and does satiate our hunger with spiritual food that will nourish us into wholeness. 

Are there things you do that are attempts to satiate a spiritual longing that only God can fulfill?  In what ways have you experienced God’s response to spiritual hunger? 

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    Holy One,
    Come to us.
    Fill us with your fullness.
    Remind us that our desires are good
    and that love and abundance are present in our lives.
    Gently reveal to us the deep desire of the world.
    What is our part in fulfilling such hunger, such longing?
    Show us your five thousand,
    that we may feed them.
    We hunger to do justice.
    We hunger for mercy.
    We hunger to walk humbly.
    Root us and ground us in your love
    Sustain us in the work
    Amen.


Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

18th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 13), Year B

 

    Giving Life to the World

All relationships are life-giving for everyone when they are grounded in mutual love, honesty, repentance and forgiveness.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

2 Samuel 11:26-12:13a & Psalm 51:1-12 or Exodus 16:2-4, 9-15 & Psalm 78:23-29; Ephesians 4:1-16; John 6:24-35


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“God’s love and forgiveness in the presence of Christ in the sacramental bread (manna and Eucharist or Communion) is available to all who come hungry and thirsty.”

Helene Tallon Russell

“God sustains us as we venture into unknown regions.”

Charles W. Allen

“The question is will we live into God's image or will we try to force God into our image?”

Marti J. Steussy



    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

This week’s Bible readings offer glimpses of relationships as they are meant to be, but sometimes those glimpses run counter to the agendas of some of the biblical writers. Helene and Charles are struck by the classic story of prophetic speaking truth to power in 2 Samuel 11:26-12:13a. By telling a story of a rich man stealing and killing a poor man’s “pet” lamb, Nathan reminds David that power and privilege do not entitle him to violate other relationships that are more vulnerable.

The story, however, speaks not only against some of David actions, but also against some of God’s actions, at least as God is portrayed here. As Marti points out, God is not miffed because David took a woman from another man. God is only miffed because David did it independently of God. After all, God routinely takes men’s wives (who are never consulted) and gives them to other men (12:8, 11-12)! Furthermore, God spares David’s life only by transferring the punishment to his newborn baby. If we and David are angered at the portrayal of a rich man violating a poor man’s relationship, should we be any less angry at this portrayal of God? Speaking truth to power means denouncing images of God as a willful tyrant, even when those images appear in the Bible.

The theme of David’s penitence is picked up by Psalm 51. Helene, Marti and Charles all wonder if we ever sin against God alone (verse 4). Does not sin distort all our relationships, not just those with God?  Verse 5 is one of those often cited to support the idea of “original sin.” That term may not be helpful. It is more helpful to acknowledge that we are born from and into a world of broken relationships, and we should not pretend otherwise. Among those broken relationships are homophobic and patriarchal ones.

When you see relationships violated, do you get angry? Do you ever find yourself to be the guilty party? When have you experienced the need to confess, or hear another’s confession and seek reconciliation?

Exodus 16:2-4, 9-15 is clearly connected to the reading from the gospel of John. After venturing out into the unknown, the Israelites have second thoughts and complain. But God provides for them by sending quails and, more importantly, manna. Charles notes that in Hebrew man hu (verse 15) can be translated in two ways: “What is it?” and, “It is manna”—a self-answering question and a self-questioning answer. God provides “what-is-it?”

Helene cautions that there is a danger here for Christian readers, who may be tempted to identify more with Moses and put down the people of Israel. The lesson itself seems to invite that putdown. But we should remember that there is nothing unbiblical or unfaithful about honest complaints before God. We only need to read the psalms! When the people of Israel express their doubts and fears, says, Helene, God remains faithful to the covenanted relationship, sustaining them in the wilderness in ways they cannot fathom.

Do you ever have second thoughts about the unconventional paths you have chosen? Do you express them honestly? What gets you through it? What sustains you?

Ephesians 4:1-16 calls us to “grow up” (verse 15) as members of the one Body of Christ. Helene observes that this is a call, not just to unity, but to diversity according to our different gifts (verses 11-12). Charles notes that, although we are called to bear with one another in love (verse 2), we are also called to speak the truth in love (verse15). People are not necessarily being divisive when they speak in passionate dissent, and unity cannot be invoked to stifle honesty. Marti suggests the following questions for discernment that all of us need to ask:

What winds, trickery and scheming blow about and capture us? How do we cultivate the thoughtfulness that will let us see through ideological manipulation? How do we find the courage to speak the truth in love (harder than speaking in anger), and how do we cultivate a listening attitude that will let us hear such truth when it’s being spoken to us?

John 6:24-35 (and the rest of the chapter) sounds like sacramental language of the Eucharist or Holy Communion, although John’s version of the last supper never mentions broken bread or a shared cup. In the prologue to this gospel (John 1:1-18), John presented Jesus as the all-creative Word made flesh, the embodiment of the true light which enlightens everyone. Now Jesus embodies “that which comes down from heaven and gives life to the world” (verse 33), that is, “the true bread from heaven” (verse 32).

Charles, Helene and Marti agree that this somewhat sacramental equation can point in more than one direction. On the one hand, Jesus, as John portrays him here, seems to imply that the original manna in the time of Moses only foreshadowed the real stuff that Jesus now offers. But, Charles asks, was not the original manna also an embodiment of the same, life-giving activity of God?  It is one thing to say that Jesus is truly one with that life-giving activity, but quite another to say that nothing else could share in that intimate union. Marti and Helene agree: what gives life to the world cannot be confined to Jesus. Sacraments are not containers. Neither are sacramental relationships, whether conventional or unconventional. All are life-giving, none are the only givers of life.

How do our relationships bring us to life? How can we share their life-giving power with those around us? What makes a relationship a sacrament?

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    Nourish us, O God, with the bread that gives life to the world.
    Bring wholeness to our broken relationships,
    that they may become sacraments of your boundless generosity.
    And give us the courage to speak truth to power. Amen.

Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

19th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 14), Year B

 

    Facing Life's Extremes

In the extremes of grief, despair and anger, we find strength to keep going.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

2 Samuel 18:5-9, 15, 31-33 & Psalm 130 or 1 Kings 19:4-8 & Psalm 34:1-8; Ephesians 4:25-5:2; John 6:35, 41-51


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“These Bible passages highlight spiritual nourishment which – whether Eucharist or Communion, truth, pot luck church meals, tenderheartedness, or simply bread eaten with the awareness of the divine presence – strengthen us by centering us in what is holy and truly significant.”

Helene Tallon Russell

“By living in love we find the strength we need for our journeys through grief, despair and anger.”

Charles W. Allen

“The church sometimes states its promises of deliverance a little more absolutely than is helpful.  If you’ve been praying and the prayers haven’t been answered, it doesn’t mean you’re one of the sinners.”

Marti J. Steussy



    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

All of today’s Bible lessons bring to mind people in extreme situations: David’s grief, Elijah’s despair, the faith community’s bitterness, wrath and malice, Jesus’ connection of boundless life with his looming death. And all of the lessons speak of the God who gets us through these situations. A common temptation is to focus on the getting-through without honestly confronting the full impact of the extremities.

What are some of the extreme situations that have shaped your life? How did you find strength to make it through them? How was God present to you then? Was God present to you?

2 Samuel 18:5-9, 15, 31-33, when heard out of context, signals a moving – and violent –story  of a father’s grief over his rebellious son’s death. Marti points out, however, that according to the narrator, Absalom’s rebellion, the resulting nationwide battle, and his defeat and death were all part of God’s way of continuing to punish David for his “zipper problem” – his sexual escapades. Those who died, says Helene, were what Star Trek fans call “Ensign Expendables,” characters introduced and killed off to have effects on the protagonist. This is what results, says Marti, when people assume, with the narrator, that every event is a direct blessing or punishment from God.

Charles hears in David’s lament a protest against the narrator’s theology. David cannot accept the outcome as God’s will and lets grief overwhelm him. On the other hand, his inability to appreciate the sacrifices countless others made to keep him alive remains problematic. Psalm 130 fits well with David’s grief. Marti points out that the psalmist, unlike the narrator of 2 Samuel, views God primarily as the one who loves and redeems, not the enforcer of punishment.

How do you see God at work in the events of your life? Is every event a direct reward or punishment? What moves you to protest when others try to explain God’s will for you? What are your images of God?  Do they include God as a rewarder/punisher or that of a lover/redeemer?

In the eyes of this story’s narrator, Elijah’s despair (1 Kings 19:4-8) follows on the heels of a stunning victory.  Yet, it may be a troublesome victory in the eyes of many readers today. God had just vindicated Elijah through a spectacular miracle, and Elijah had just seen to the execution of around 850 of his opponents, only to find that the king’s wife wants to execute him in retaliation (1 Kings 18:20-19:3). Now he is on the run and so disheartened as to ask for death.

Instead of facing death,  an angel wakes Elijah from sleep and provides enough nourishment for a forty-day trip to Horeb (Mt. Sinai), where he will eventually encounter God as “a sound of sheer silence” (verse.12). Despite the violent background, Helene, Marti and Charles agree that the theme here is almost too obvious: finding the resources to continue at just the point when we think we can go no further. The link to the gospel reading from John is equally obvious. Psalm 34:1-8 picks up the theme of deliverance from trouble, although, as Marti remarks, it has been “niceified” by omitting verse 9-22, which promise death to the wicked.

Ephesians 4:25-5:2 offers an early vision of the Christian community. It dreams of a community in which people are safe to be honest about who and where they are and it calls the readers to be that community. Charles and Helene both appreciate that the writer does not try do deny the legitimacy of anger (verse 26). Marti agrees up to a point, but offers an important caution: “The advice here is great so long as we understand what a complex process putting away bitterness and wrath is.  It’s not as easy as just knowing you should. When real harm has been done and there is real cause for anger, it may take longer than a day to get over it!”  The passage raises the question: can today’s church be a safe space for people who experience the extremes of grief, despair and anger? Are we too quick to deny whatever looks discomforting? The image of the community in this lesson may be too idealized, but it is an inviting one for those of us who live and love —unconventionally — as Christ forgives and loves us.

How do you find a balance between your need to admit anger and your need to move on? Are there friends or communities that let you be yourself while encouraging you to live in love?

Jesus continues his lengthy discourse about himself as the bread of life in John 6:35, 41-51. What he claims strikes his audience as implausible on the face of it (how can somebody we know be from heaven?), but he goes beyond the implausible to the revolting by saying “the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh” (verse 51).

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Christians should note that eating human flesh is an abhorrent punishment (and probably an abomination) according to Leviticus 26:29. What does that mean for Christians who claim to eat Jesus’ flesh every week? Aside from these obvious connotations of cannibalism, Jesus is making a direct connection between the boundless life he offers and the death he must face to offer it. As with much of John’s gospel, a message of welcome and inclusion (“Whoever comes to me will never be hungry,” verse 35) seems to vie with a message of superiority and exclusion (“Your ancestors ate manna in the wilderness, and they died,” verse 49). But Charles notes that verses 44-45 seems to undercut any claims that Jesus is the “only way” (a misreading of John 14:6). Here there is access to “the Father” which is not through Jesus, but the other way around — no one can come to Jesus except through “the Father.” The unflattering comparison between Jesus, the true bread, and the Israelites’ manna is in fact no comparison at all. People who “eat Jesus” also die in precisely the way the earlier Israelites did. Jesus himself dies! We still hunger and thirst too,

Helene, points out that it is not clear we should want something that fully satisfies us, as we are always works in progress. Again, it is tempting to read Jesus’ welcoming words as a promise to rescue us from living fully in the present, but the allusion to his death reminds us that all of these images are complex, carrying several meanings at once.

How do you hear the promise, “Whoever comes to me will never be hungry”? Are you included in that promise? How do our hungers tell us what we need?

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    Bread of life,
    come to us in our moments of deepest need,
    and sustain us in our own wildernesses of rejection and misunderstanding
    that we may never die to your call to live in love as you love us. Amen.

Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

20th Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 16), Year B

 

    Nourished by Wisdom

Wisdom, God’s wisdom, isn’t conventional wisdom at all. You’ll be surprised.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

1 Kings 2:10-12, 3:3-14 & Psalm 111 or Proverbs 9:1-6 & Psalm 34:9-14; Ephesians 5:15-20; John 6:51-58


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“Wisdom comes to us in many forms, some familiar, others seemingly ludicrous.”

Charles W. Allen

“How we really live wise and fulfilled lives is an ages-long question.”

Marti J. Steussy

“Wisdom, divine insight, God’s love and grace, are given in sharing a meal, a divine banquet, not by having to earn it or study it or buy it.”

Helene Tallon Russell


    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

The Bible lessons for this week focus on wisdom. But they may not all agree on what counts as wisdom. Is it the conventional wisdom of Poor Richard’s Almanac or the apparent foolishness of a God who endures hatred and rejection?

The narrator of 1 Kings 2:10-12, 3:3-14 seems to have an implicit understanding of wisdom that is not fully supported by this particular episode, says Charles. For the narrator, a wise king would worship only in Jerusalem, never in “the high places” (verse 3).  And yet, when God appears to Solomon to grant him wisdom, Solomon has been worshipping in “the principle high place” (verse 4)! The narrator has a problem with this, but God apparently does not. God’s wisdom portrayed here does not match the narrator’s. Those of us who live and love unconventionally will inevitably take heart from such a contrast.  Many people today consider same-sex marriages improper, but that does not mean that God will not show up to bless them.

Admittedly, as Marti and Helene point out, this episode in 1 Kings was presumably written earlier by Solomon’s court historians with their own self-serving agendas. The net effect, however, is that in its current setting we have an episode depicting God’s wisdom that contradicts the narrator’s judgment. Psalm 111 connects with this lesson in verse 10: “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.”

What sort of wisdom governs your life? If your life does not conform to conventional wisdom, are you aware of a deeper wisdom that gives life deeper meaning? If so, have you shared this wisdom with others? Why not do that?

Marti grants that the book of Proverbs often suggests that piety, wisdom and wealth go together. While Charles, like Marti, is skeptical about this, he does recognize that this is often a helpful approach in addiction recovery programs. People in recovery often do experience a better life as a result of wise choices and a deepened spirituality. This is true enough, though it may sound like conventional wisdom. Charles also hears the voice of conventional wisdom in Proverbs 9:6: “Lay aside immaturity, and live.” But Helene disagrees. It is not conventional “for the powerful of the world to teach by hosting a banquet.”

Marti, Charles and Helene all agree that the depiction of Wisdom as a woman in Proverbs 9:1-6, though common in the Bible’s wisdom literature, is a shock to today’s conventional wisdom. Charles agrees that, even at its most conventional, there is definitely some gender-bending, subversive potential here. Marti adds that “this lady is also being pretty suggestive in her invitations!” Just as appealing is the suggestion that God (as Lady Wisdom) “really wants to reach out to the fools, the senseless and the immature, which all of us are some of the time!” Psalm 34:9-14, like Psalm 111, implies that the “fear of the Lord” is essential to wisdom.

Does following familiar, wise advice sometimes bring you to a better place? When has that worked, and when hasn’t it? What does it mean for you to “lay aside immaturity, and live”? Does it match what others mean?

The connection between Ephesians 5:15-20 and the preceding lessons couldn’t be more obvious: “Be careful then how you live, not as unwise people but as wise” (verse 15). In spite of the advice against drunkenness, the alternative, being filled with the Spirit, does not sound like today’s conventional advice. Paul probably is not the author of Ephesians, but if the person writing in his name is Pauline enough, Charles proposes, then the wisdom mentioned here is not everyday wisdom but “the foolishness of God” (1 Corinthians 1: 25) embodied in Jesus’ life, death and risen life.

Marti notes that living in evil days (verse 16) refers to people who are marginalized for not living like the majority in their culture — for choosing a wisdom different from “the world’s” (the straight world’s?). Helene is captivated by the hint that we live and grow according to this Wisdom by welcoming the Spirit of joy into our hearts like a melody. “Melodies get into your heart and you can’t get them out.”

How might singing make you wise? What songs speak to you? What kind of music does God’s foolish-looking wisdom suggest?

For the third week in a row, we are presented with Jesus as the living bread that came down from heaven, this time in John 6:51-58. John still presents Jesus as implying that the living bread offered through him is far superior to the original manna of “the Jews.” As in previous weeks, Marti, Charles and Helene find John’s efforts here unsuccessful and contrary to the deeper meaning of the life God shares with us in Jesus and in Torah (Jewish law and tradition).  

Recalling the theme of wisdom this week, Charles asks, “What could sound more foolish than ‘unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you’ (verse 53)?” Anybody in their right mind would wonder what John could possibly mean. One can imagine, says Marti, why rumors of Christian cannibalism spread around the Empire. What John is alluding to, says Charles, is the God of Christians and Jews who defeats evil not through dominating it but through enduring and outlasting it – all of which is embodied in a new way in Jesus’ death and resurrection. Christians who try to make a triumphalistic message out of this are turning subversive wisdom into the tritest sort of competition. Helene notes how Jesus’ words here connect well with Lady Wisdom’s banquet in Proverbs.

How can we defeat the evils of homophobia and other bigotry? How do we tell the difference between passive acceptance and nonviolent subversion? Where might God be calling you to engage in nonviolent subversion on behalf of God’s justice and love?

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    Gracious Wisdom,
    you have set your table and called us to your banquet.
    You allure us with your invitation.
    Teach us to recognize and love all your ways, both familiar and
    subversive,
    and place your unending melody in our hearts. Amen.


Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

21st Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 16), Year B

 

    Beyond Everything Familiar

God meets us in worship, in our decisions, in our struggles, even in what may offend us, and draws us into unfamiliar territory.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

1 Kings 8:1, 6, 10-11, 22-30, 41-43 & Psalm 84 or Joshua 24:1-2a, 14-18 or Psalm 34:15-22; Ephesians 6:10-20; John 6:56-69


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

“God doesn't have to hate somebody else in order to love me."

Marti J. Steussy

“As we read about God’s grace as continually expanding in inclusivity – drawing in foreigners, swallows, and those who find the teachings difficult – God is bidding us to include all those considered ‘others’ by our society and culture."

Helene Tallon Russell

“Everyday activities can manifest something more than the everyday — a God who takes us beyond everything familiar.”

Charles W. Allen


    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

Solomon’s prayer in 1 Kings 8:1, 6, 10-11, 22-30, 41-43 shows him struggling between his desires to provide a suitable setting where God may be encountered and his recognition that God cannot be confined by any setting, not even the most lavishly constructed temple. Helene, Marti and Charles concur that here we also see the beginnings of the idea that God is more than Israel’s God in verses 41-43. Foreigners can also pray “toward” the temple and expect to be effectively heard. These are not converts (there is no “Judaism” as such to convert to yet), and there is no mention of foreigners keeping the Law, or of their being theologically correct.  The expectation is simply to  recognize that the God who is invoked is great and mighty.

In other words, says Charles, God is specifically involved in the worship of the temple and in the people of Israel.  Yet a God who cannot be contained is also involved elsewhere and in other peoples, in ways we do not have to specify. Helene sees a clear parallel between the inclusion of “foreigners” here and the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people today, who may not interpret the Bible in the same way as the majority of churchgoers. Marti invites us to compare this passage with the treatment of foreigners and eunuchs in texts like Deuteronomy 23:1-3 and Isaiah 56:1-7. She asks, “Is God most honored by allowing only the most honorable to draw near, or by God’s ability to receive those whom the world does not receive?”

Psalm 84 takes the theme of inclusive even further — God’s temple provides a dwelling place for nonhumans too. Helene reminds us, furthermore, that some birds are ambi-sexual, though this probably did not occur to the psalmist.

How and where do you worship God? Does your worship convey that God is present? Does it convey that God is free to be present anywhere? How welcome are strangers?

Joshua 24:1-2a, 14-18 can easily be read, and has been read, as encouraging the rankest form of intolerance — “only our way is the right way, so you’d better choose our way or be driven out.”  But, asks Charles, is this just an insistence that everyone embrace our view of God, or is it a call to everyone, we included, to serve a God who is not confined even by our best traditions? With the benefit of hindsight, this lesson can be read as calling us  to keep expanding our views of God. The direction of that expansion, Helene adds, is one of liberation, not of the conquest that Joshua envisions. In that light, the God of Psalm 34:15-22 is not so much the judge between the righteous and unrighteous as the one who “is near to the brokenhearted, and saves the crushed in spirit” (verse 18).

How do we tell the difference between God and our own views of God? How do we remain open? Can we make space, without undercutting where we need to stand, for others who believe they must stand somewhere else?

People who are tired of hearing God invoked to justify military ventures are likely to be put off by the militaristic imagery of Ephesians 6:10-20. The language of “spiritual warfare” can also easily slide into obsessions with paranormal entities. But Helene suggests that this imagery can be seen as a move to subvert our inherent tendencies toward warfare and violence.

Charles is reminded of an exchange in the movie Jeffrey. Jeffrey, a gay man, is accosted by gay bashers who threaten to kill him. He says, “You have weapons? So do I … irony, adjectives, eyebrows.” The weapons in Ephesians are truth, righteousness, peace, faith, salvation, and the Spirit. Like Jeffrey, those of us who are marginalized must often rely on such intangibles to respond to attacks. We do, furthermore, contend not just with “blood and flesh” but with principalities and powers in the forms of homophobia, heterosexism and patriarchy. [See Walter Wink, The Powers That Be (New York: Doubleday, 1998.)] Marti is concerned that such combat imagery, even when “spiritualized” can still encourage us to see the goal as one of destroying what threatens us. The goal however is not destruction but transformation and reconciliation.

How do you view the powers that attempt to marginalize you? How do you engage them? What list of “weapons” would you make? What goal do you envision?

John 6:56-69 is the final portion in Jesus’ lengthy discourse about the living bread from heaven. His language is bound to offend all his listeners: “Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them” (verse 56). Such a practice, in literal terms, would be an abomination, yet Jesus speaks as though what is taken by some to be an abomination may turn out to be life-giving.

Even Jesus’ disciples find these words difficult, and many turn away. Charles suggests a parallel. Today many respond to an LGBT-friendly gospel with “this teaching is difficult,” and many turn back. Unpopularity does not prove that our rendition of the gospel is right, but it can’t be cited against us either. Helene finds welcome in the fact that some disciples did have difficulty with Jesus’ teaching. True, some left because of that, but Jesus did not drive them away. We do not all have to agree to be in community.

When others have difficulty with what you consider good news, how do you respond? Should you change what you say? Are those who have difficulty still friends? How do you decide?

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    God beyond our reckoning,
    make your dwelling-place with us,
    and move us beyond our own limited glimpses of your presence.
    Dwell with us also in our struggles against all that oppresses us,
    that we may not demonize others
    but call them, with us, to grow beyond where we are. Amen.


Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.




 

22nd Sunday in Ordinary Time (Proper 17), Year B

 

    Listening, Loving, Doing

Today’s Bible readings call for listening and thinking with our hearts, cultivating purity of heart and rejecting traditions which fall short of God’s justice and mercy.

This week's lectionary Bible passages:

Song of Solomon 2:8-13 & Psalm 45:1-2, 6-9 or Deuteronomy 4:1-2,6-9 & Psalm 15; James 1:17-27; Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23


    Who's in the Conversation
    A conversation among the following scholars and pastors

 “From listening comes doing – comes action! When we know ourselves and those around us, we are able to act with true purity of heart.”

Larissa Kwong Abazia

“The admonition to be ‘slow to anger’ is not a pronouncement against feelings, but a challenge to remember that anger is only a messenger of legitimate need – not a producer of righteousness.”

Jacki Belile

“We need to listen with our hearts along with our minds.  When I think with my heart, I can avoid being trapped in Tradition – refusing to ask questions or following along because I don’t know any other way.”

Sarah Carpenter-Vascik


    What's Out in the Conversation
    A conversation about this week's lectionary Bible passages

Our conversation about this week’s lectionary Bible passages began with James 1:17-27. What is the way of God’s wisdom?  The book of James suggests that it is the “law of liberty” (James 2:12).  And that law starts with doing.  Doers of the law’s basic justice requirements place themselves in risky outreach settings in which we are inevitably challenged to know who we really are.  Acts of justice hold up the mirror that enables our transformation of heart, while doctrinal obsessions and arguments merely keep us in bondage.

Deeds and words both matter in the book of James.  And at the beginning of today’s reading, we are called to be quick to listen, not to speak (James 1:19). This is a kind of listening that calls for inward listening.  Sarah, a transgender woman, reminds us:  “Before my transition, I needed to step back and away from all the outside advice I was getting from people. I needed to really listen for God’s voice inside, in the midst of all the other voices.” Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people know that it is often a matter of life and death that we distinguish the voices and learn to trust inner listening.  The author of James provokes us, however, to remember that such times of contemplation cannot be divorced from habits of service and justice.

Listening to others without a prayerful discerning heart can lead to powerlessness.  Words can be hurtful, dangerous and affect others in ways that the speaker may not realize.   Those in power in our denomination, local church or civic settings may have power to name the “tradition” or to label others: for example, when only men decide about women's ordination or only heterosexuals decide about the ordination of LGBT people in the church. Fatigued by the struggle against endless pronouncements, LGBT people may come to this place: “I just don’t know if I can listen anymore.”   We cannot ignore the reality of power by idealizing an uncritical, non-discerning listening posture.  We can, instead, lift up a reminder that those in power may themselves be transformed when they have the courage to listen to LGBT people for God’s voice.

What do you do to listen for God’s voice in the midst of so many voices saying so many things?  Where is God’s voice in those that judge you defiled or stained?  Is it there at all? What spiritual practices are important to you as you listen for God’s voice?

Concerns for avoiding being stained or defiled -- and the efficacy of human laws for purity -- are clear, too, in Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23.   There, the attachments to habits of  ritual purification by some first-century religious leaders are challenged by Jesus.  Then, as now, codes and rules can be used as weapons of “gatekeepers” to avoid encounters with the others or to decide “who’s in, who’s out.”  Jesus calls upon the prophetic tradition of Isaiah to challenge “human precepts” which stand as replacements of  God’s true law, a law intended to create a purity of heart that seeks encounter, not escape from the “other”  (Mark 7:6-7 and Isaiah 29:13).

These hard words about purity codes are not only for those who push others outside.  The words challenge the internal purity codes that many LGBT people carry within their own hearts.  We know  that many people, and LGBT people in particular, carry a profound internalized sense that they are corrupt from the inside out and incapable of producing good fruit, just and compassionate action.  Addressing this entrenched lie requires pastoral listening, storytelling in community, and theological reflection on our gifted lives.  It also calls us to overcome our self-negativity with compassionate action so we can remember who we truly are.   Joined to God in just and loving action, we are ever more deeply formed in God.

Such just and compassionate action will call us to act and challenge destructive and death-dealing systems and laws wherever we encounter them – inside the church or outside.  We resist sexist, racist, heterosexist and gender-dualist precepts through family and civic mores as well. The church must challenge them all.  It is our call to evaluate and challenge traditions in the light of unfolding understanding of creation, justice and God’s gospel of grace.

Where have you heard judgments about you that declare you to be defiled?  What was said?  How did you respond?  When might you make such judgments? 

We long for a life-giving law, guidelines that generate liberty, justice and purity of heart.   Where do we turn for admonitions and standards which ground us and invite encounter, growth, and liberating listening for God’s new Word? 

In the book of Deuteronomy 4, we read about God’s call to God’s people to “give heed to statutes and ordinances” (verse 1).  We wonder: Why the call has often been used as dangerous seeds of religious supremacy, unquestioned obedience to rules, and closed thinking?  At the same time, we know faithfulness and obedience reflect the covenant of love we share with God.  The lectionary invites us to turn to the psalms and Song of Solomon, other words from the Hebrew Scripture, to add to and form our understanding of faithfulness.

In Psalm 15, the psalmist envisions measurements of “blameless” (verse 2) which echo in the witness of Jesus and the author of James.  True religion, true spiritual security, lies in a lifestyle of honesty, care for our neighbors’ needs and reputations, and sacrificial integrity.  “Those who do these things shall never be moved” (verse 5).

LGBT people who seek a holy life know well what it is to receive slander.  We know what it is to experience evil at the hand of well-intentioned friends.  We know the cost of public reproach:  organized efforts to prevent equal access to marital benefits, employment and housing opportunities and the stripping away of the Church’s blessing.  We are challenged by Psalm 15 to imagine that our abiding peace comes not merely from successful battles for social advancement, but from faithful lifestyles of justice-making.  This is not because such acts are necessary to earn God’s favor, but because lifestyles of justice and service place us in perpetual encounter of others and ourselves.

What does it mean to despise the works of the evil – including those aimed at us --  without diminishing sacred worth of those who sin against us? 

Inclusion of the Song of Solomon in the lectionary ought to provoke us to appreciate this rare ancient witness, which is so clearly an unapologetic blessing of sexual love.   There is joy in Song of Solomon 2:8-13, (a text labeled “springtime rhapsody”).  There is leaping, bounding, looking and singing. When we reflected on the passage, we imagined lovers’ relief and release at springtime legislative victories for gay marriage and civil unions across our land.  This ancient text about beauty, desire and love (outside of  traditional marital norms then or now!) communicates the transcendent longing, hope and joy potentially known in all forms of erotic union when tenderness, appreciation and invitation to communion are present.   We dare to imagine that generations of lovers raised in welcoming churches may practice an embodied spirituality, a more faithful vehicle for receiving the whole gifts of God’s wisdom, healing this world and blessing even our opponents.  “Arise, my love, and come away” (verse 10).  Let’s hear in these words an invitation to encounter this world, rather than seek to escape its stain. 

What does God’s love teach us about human love?  And what does human love have to teach us about God’s love?    How might a fear of the erotic get in the way of deeply appreciating and attending to one another?

    Prayerfully Out in Scripture

    We come, O God, with grace poured on our lips
    by the unconditional love you offer us.
    In You all equity, righteousness and love are sought
    in our hearts and fulfilled in our actions.
    Without You, our hearts are hollow;
    wickedness is lived out in our interactions and our labors are empty.
    Guide us so that we may join as one community
    to truly listen to the voices and stories of others.
    Help us to avoid the human divisiveness that calls us
    to see people as “other” instead of brother, sister or friend.
    Only then shall we act in ways of love for all of your people.
    Spirit, anoint us to sing songs of love throughout creation. Amen.


Bible passages are selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Consultation on Common Text (CCT). All rights reserved. Used by permission.